How would you describe your involvement in the public consultation process for the Section 508/255 Refresh? Select all that apply.
A |
I have submitted/will submit comments. | [ 42% (15 votes) ] |
B |
I have read the documentation in detail but won't be providing comments. | [ 8% (3 votes) ] |
C |
I have briefly read the documentation. | [ 3% (1 votes) ] |
D |
I have attended a public event to become informed about the refresh. | [ 50% (18 votes) ] |
E |
I am sitting out this round and will provide feedback during the next comment period. | [ 3% (1 votes) ] |
F |
I'm interested but had no time to review the documentation and provide comments. | [ 33% (12 votes) ] |
G |
I have no interest in the Section 508/255 refresh. | |
H |
Other | [ 22% (8 votes) ] |
| I have read the documentation in detail and my comments will be consolidated with others' from my organization. |
| Hadn't heard about the refresh... |
| Former Access Board Member and TEITAC liaison involved in development of initial TEITAC Recommendations. Comments provided for ANPRM largely for clearity and continuity. Will provide more detailed com |
| I haven't been informed. |
| I ran a public eventin Washington, DC, on new Section 508/255 refresh. |
| I was part of a group that collaborated on reviewing and commenting on the refresh. Comments were submitted as a group. |
Twtpoll created by @jennison more than 20 months ago
![]()
Comment with Twitter
Comment with Facebook
| 36 votes |
83 web views |
0 mobi views |
This poll has ended!
| Tweet |
|
![]()
![]()
Run an effective social media promotion with OneKontest. http://onekontest.com